Search for: All records

Piezoelectric materials are commonplace in modern devices, and the prevalence of these materials is poised to increase in the years to come. The majority of known piezoelectrics are oxide materials, due in part to the related themes of a legacy of ceramists building off of mineralogical crystallography and the relative simplicity of fabricating oxide specimens. However, diversification beyond oxides offers exciting opportunities to identify and develop new materials perhaps better suited for certain applications. Aluminum nitride (and recently, its Sc-modified derivative) is the only commercially integrated piezoelectric nitride in use today, although this is likely to change in the near future with increased use of high-throughput techniques for materials discovery and development. This review covers modern methods—both computational and experimental—that have been developed to explore chemical space for new materials with targeted characteristics. Here, the authors focus on the application of computational and high-throughput experimental approaches to discovering and optimizing piezoelectric nitride materials. While the focus of this review is on the search for and development of new piezoelectric nitrides, most of the research approaches discussed in this article are both chemistry- and application-agnostic. 

A systematic study of (1− x )Pb(Fe 0.5 Nb 0.5 )O 3 – x BiFeO 3 ( x = 0–0.5) was performed by combining dielectric and electromechanical measurements with structural and microstructural characterization in order to investigate the strengthening of the relaxor properties when adding BiFeO 3 into Pb(Fe 0.5 Nb 0.5 )O 3 and forming a solid solution. Pb(Fe 0.5 Nb 0.5 )O 3 crystalizes in monoclinic symmetry exhibiting ferroelectric-like polarization versus electric field ( P–E ) hysteresis loop and sub-micron-sized ferroelectric domains. Adding BiFeO 3 to Pb(Fe 0.5 Nb 0.5 )O 3 favors a pseudocubic phase and a gradual strengthening of the relaxor behavior of the prepared ceramics. This is indicated by a broadening of the peak in temperature-dependent permittivity, narrowing of P–E hysteresis loops and decreasing size of ferroelectric domains resulting in polar nanodomains for x = 0.20 composition. The relaxor behavior was additionally confirmed by Vogel–Fulcher analysis. For the x ≥ 0.30 compositions, broad high-temperature anomalies are observed in dielectric permittivity versus temperature measurements in addition to the frequency-dispersive peak located close to room temperature. These samples also exhibit pinched P–E hysteresis loops. The observed pinching is most probably related to the reorganization of polar nanoregions under the electric field as shown by synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements as well as by piezo-response force microscopy analysis, while in part affected by the presence of charged point defects and anti-ferroelectric order, as indicated from rapid cooling experiments and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, respectively.